UPDATE: Senator Boxer, while opposed to the Southwick nomination, was not present for the cloture and confirmation votes on the floor of Senate.

At least one of California’s Senators is doing the right thing and voting against Southwick’s confirmation. Thank you, Senator Boxer!

The Fifth Circuit serves one of the most racially diverse regions in the country, and frequently hears critical civil rights cases. It is especially important, therefore, that a nominee to this court possess an unshakable commitment to equal justice and a willingness to protect the rights of groups such as minorities, workers, and consumers.

Unfortunately, President Bush has chosen a nominee who favors business interests over the interests of ordinary Americans and displays little regard for issues faced by minority communities. As a Mississippi state court judge, Mr. Southwick upheld a ruling that reinstated a state employee who used a racial slur, and in another case, found the sexual orientation of a mother to be a deciding factor in denying her custody of her child.

I am deeply disappointed that President Bush has once again attempted to fill the Fifth Circuit vacancy with a nominee holding views far to the right of most Americans.

Mr. Southwick’s nomination was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee on August 2, 2007 and will soon be considered by the entire Senate. Be assured that I will only support nominees who will safeguard the rights and freedoms of all Americans, and I do not support Mr. Southwick’s nomination.

The Hill is reporting that Sen. Feinstein “would vote for cloture and for the nomination on the floor.” Alliance for Justice also told us that Feinstein was on the floor speaking in favor of Southwick’s confirmation.

A vote to end debate on Southwick’s nomination to the Fifth Circuit is scheduled for tomorrow, Wednesday, at 11 a.m EDT.  If that vote succeeds, the full Senate will vote on his confirmation.

Every vote is being mustered, even while we’re apparently losing votes from moderate and Red State Democrats who plan to vote for the judge. The Boston Globe reports that Senators McCain and Obama are cutting show campaign trips to be on the floor tomorrow.

Meanwhile, Demetrius Shelton of the National Bar Association informs us that the California Association of Black Lawyers and the Black Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles have both now gone on record opposing Southwick’s nomination. We thank them and welcome their opposition to the nominee.

Special thanks to Kimberlei Evans, president of the Charles Houston Bar Association, for securing CHBA’s opposition to Southwick. CHBA is an affiliate of the National Bar Association.

We also want to thank National Bar Association vice president Demetrius Shelton for working the emails and phones, getting NBA members and affiliates to call in opposition to Southwick:

The National Bar Association needs our help in encouraging Senator Feinstein to vote no on the nomination of Judge Leslie Southwick to the US Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit.  We have received word that the nomination may be voted on as soon as tomorrow.  Please contact Senator Feinstein’s office and let your voice be heard on this very important issue. In short, Judge Southwick’s record while serving as a Mississippi state appeals court judge is replete with evidence that he is hostile to African-Americans and disadvantaged people including a  decision upholding the reinstatement of a social worker who used a racial epithet (the “n-word”) to describe a colleague.   Please see e-mail below from our friends at the Equal Justice Society summarizing the issue more fully.

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 10-9 nearly along party lines Aug. 2 to approve the nomination. To our surprise, California Democrat Dianne Feinstein joined all nine committee Republicans in voting for the nomination.  We ask that upon receipt of this e-mail that you contact Senator Feinstein’s office and urge her to vote no tomorrow when this matter comes before the full Senate!

A Congressional Quarterly article today by Keith Perine indicates that moderate Democrats are trying to push through Southwick in return for GOP Senators getting out of the way on spending bills. This is absolutely the wrong type of compromise. Visit NoSouthwick.com to help us push Senators to vote NO on Southwick.

A moderate Senate Democrat is working behind the scenes to line up enough Democrats to force a confirmation vote on a contentious appellate court nominee, while winning concessions from Republicans in return.

Nebraska Democrat Ben Nelson is trying to corral at least 11 Democrats and nine Republicans for a deal that would in some ways echo the “Gang of 14” effort that averted a Senate implosion over judicial nominations in 2005. This time, though, Nelson has broadened his effort.

On one hand, he is trying to persuade Democrats to vote against a filibuster of the nomination of Leslie Southwick to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. But Nelson also wants Republicans to agree, in return, to not stand in the way of Senate action on fiscal 2008 spending bills.
(more…)

A floor vote by the Senate on Southwick that was expected today will not take place, according to a staffer in Sen. Feinstein’s office. No word on when it might be rescheduled.

And CaliforniaProgressReport.com published today a post by Alliance for Justice’s Doug Lakey, “Feinstein Asked by Civil Rights Community to Oppose Southwick Confirmation to US Court of Appeals.”

The editorial board of The New York Times launched a new blog yesterday with a post questioning Senator Dianne Feinstein’s support for Leslie Southwick, Bush’s nominee for New Orleans-based United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Judge Southwick “has the sort of record that should have made his nomination dead on arrival,” wrote the author. “Mississippi Judge Leslie Southwick, whose record includes decisions that have been labeled anti-black and anti-gay, is just the sort of Bush judicial nominee everyone thought would be blocked when Democrats retook the Senate. But Judge Southwick may be headed for confirmation thanks to Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat.”

Carrie Budoff Brown also blogged about our coalition’s efforts on politico.com:

“The other side is targeting Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Ca.), who cast the decisive vote in the Judiciary Committee that sent his nomination to the full Senate. A coalition that includes Alliance for Justice launched a petition and email campaign earlier this month, arguing that his record is hostile to gays and lesbians, workers and minorities. Videos have also been posted on YouTube.”

Other notable posts include those by Christy Hardin Smith on firedoglake.com, Brian Leubitz on calitics.com and Josh Richman on InsideBayArea.

Our NoSouthwick.com campaign presses along, but we still need your help to pressure Sen. Feinstein into opposing Southwick’s confirmation.

Visit NoSouthwick.com and check out our banner ads, YouTube videos, sign our petition and use the phone numbers we posted to call Sen. Feinstein’s office expressing your opposition to Southwick.

Alliance for Justice (afj.org) today asked that you urge your Senators to stop Leslie Southwick’s ascension to the federal bench.  In recent meetings with Senators, staff expressed doubt that their constituents care about this nomination.

AFJ has been pressing for the defeat of Leslie Southwick’s nomination to the Fifth Circuit.  But despite widespread opposition to the confirmation of Judge Southwick, his nomination was voted out of the Senate Judiciary Committee last month and now is headed to the Senate floor.

The Congressional Black Caucus, Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, People for the American Way, Human Rights Campaign, National Employment Lawyers Association, National Gay and Lesbian Taskforce, Mississippi NAACP, the Magnolia Bar and the Equal Justice Society are all calling for his defeat.

On the Mississippi Court of Appeals, Judge Leslie Southwick consistently favored corporations, insurance companies, and other powerful interests over vulnerable American workers and consumers.  His record calls into question his commitment to equal dignity and equal justice for minorities.  At his hearing, Judge Southwick did nothing to allay these serious concerns.

The Fifth Circuit has more minority residents than any other circuit and frequently hears critical civil rights cases. It is especially important, therefore, that a nominee to this court has an unwavering commitment to equal justice and a willingness to protect the rights of less politically powerful groups such as minorities, workers, and consumers.

Instead, Judge Southwick has compiled a stark and lengthy record of rejecting the claims of racial minorities and siding with business interests against workers and consumers.

Judge Southwick was criticized by a member of his own court in Mississippi for having a double standard in cases involving racial discrimination in jury selection. And, in one especially egregious case, Judge Southwick trivialized an employee’s use of the “n” word in the workplace and voted to reinstate her employment.

Moreover, Judge Southwick has an 89 percent record of voting against workers, consumers and other victims in divided decisions. In 160 out of 180 published decisions involving state employment law and torts cases in which at least two judges dissented, Judge Southwick voted against the injured party and in favor of business interests, such as corporations or insurance companies.

At his confirmation hearing, Senator Durbin (D-Il) asked Judge Southwick to give an example of a time when he’d made an unpopular decision in favor of “the little guy” — a poor person, a member of a racial minority, or someone who had turned to the courts for help. Judge Southwick couldn’t name a single one.

Judge Southwick has not shown himself to be the kind of judge fit for a lifetime seat on the federal bench.

Click here to fax a message to your Senators’ offices to vote against Leslie Southwick.

Posted today on Alliance for Justice’s Justice Digest blog:

Yesterday, President Bush sent four new Circuit Court nominees to the Senate.

Fourth Circuit: Robert J. Conrad, Jr is currently a district court judge for the Western District of North Carolina. When he was confirmed for the district judgeship in 2005, Senator Leahy and former Senator John Edwards expressed concern about his nomination. According to a statement by Senator Leahy, Conrad’s written work is disturbing. He wrote one article entitled “Planned Parenthood, A Radical, Pro-Abortion Fringe Group,” and referred to Sister Prejean’s book Dead Man Walking as “liberal drivel”

Leahy was rightly concerned that: “The rhetoric he uses is heated, and his bias for the death penalty is clear. Will any defendant in a capital case who comes before a Judge Conrad feel that they will get a fair hearing from him? Will he feel that a Judge Conrad can put aside personal prejudices and preconceptions?” Leahy went on to add: “His statements make me wonder whether any person going before a Judge Conrad in a case involving reproductive rights, or indeed any issue related to personal privacy, will feel their arguments have been fairly heard. Will he be able to follow the law as written?”

Third Circuit: Shalom D. Stone is a partner in the New Jersey law firm of Walder, Hayden & Brogan. According to an article in New Jersey’s Star Ledger, the White House ignored long-standing procedure and did not consult Stone’s home state senators Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez prior to Stone’s nomination. Neither New Jersey senator is familiar with Stone, his work or his legal views.

Fifth Circuit: Will she be another Jennifer Elrod? Catharina Haynes is currently in private practice after serving as a state court judge in Dallas, TX from 1998 until 2002. Like Elrod, it is likely that her written record as a judge is very thin.

Seventh Circuit: John Daniel Tinder has been a judge on the district court for the Southern District of Indiana since 1987.

We are concerned that the White House continues to refuse to consult with Democratic senators and to nominate people who have troubling records or no record at all. Nevertheless, we will be busily working to learn all that we can about these new nominees and whether they are qualified to serve lifetime appointments on our Circuit Courts.

No more extremist judges on the federal bench!

Recent reports indicate that Senator Dianne Feinstein “continues to wrestle with her vote” on extremist judicial nominee Leslie Southwick and “needs time ‘to think more about it.’” She must hear from us now! Contact Senator Feinstein to urge her to block the confirmation of this extremist judge because:

* Leslie Southwick has an abysmal record on racial discrimination issues
* He has expressed a willingness to discriminate against gays and lesbians
* Southwick has the worst record of his Mississippi Court of Appeals peers when it comes to workers rights

Call Senator Feinstein’s Offices:
Washington, D.C.: (202) 224-3841 / San Francisco: (415) 393-0707
Los Angeles: (310) 914-7300 / San Diego: (619) 231-1108

If you’re not in California, click here to use PFAW’s action tool.

Urge Feinstein to vote against Southwick because of his clearly demonstrated judicial extremism. Southwick and several Republican Senators are holding private meetings to assure Senator Feinstein and other Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that Southwick will be a moderate contrary to his existing record.

As a state appellate judge, Leslie Southwick had an abysmal record on racial discrimination issues. For example, he ruled to reinstate a white employee who had been fired for calling an African-American coworker “a good ole [‘n’ word].” Southwick also routinely rejected defense claims that prosecutors struck African-American jurors based on race; while at the same time, he has usually upheld allegations of race discrimination when prosecutors claim that the defense has struck white jurors.

Southwick has also expressed a willingness to discriminate against gays and lesbians. In ruling to remove a child from the custody of her bisexual mother, he joined an anti-gay opinion that argued the “choice” to engage in homosexuality comes with consequences, up to and including the consideration of “the homosexual lifestyle” as a determining factor in child custody cases. Finally, Southwick has the worst record of all judges on the Mississippi Court of Appeals when it comes to the rights of workers and victims of personal injury. In 160 of 180 published decisions, Southwick’s rulings have favored business and insurance interests over injured parties

Let Senator Feinstein know that during this past Supreme Court term we witnessed enough fallout of President Bush’s nomination of extremist judges. Justice Alito and Chief Justice Roberts both promised in Senate Confirmation hearings that their history of extremist decisions would be tempered by moderation and judicial restraint. However, just as we feared, these justices remained true to their pre-nomination ideology and in case after case pushed a conservative, reactionary agenda that caused serious cutbacks in employment discrimination law, reproductive freedom, and most recently, voluntary racial integration plans.

Now, the Administration continues to try and push ideological extremists into life appointments on the Federal Court of Appeals. President Bush has already tried to place two other unacceptable nominees on the 5th Circuit, and now pushes for Southwick’s confirmation despite a clear record of Southwick’s failing to protect victims of racial discrimination, prejudice towards gays and lesbians, and hostility towards working people.

Call Senator Feinstein TODAY and urge her to vote against the confirmation of Leslie Southwick!

It only takes minutes. All you need to do is call and tell her office that you urge the Senator to vote against the confirmation of Leslie Southwick. They ask for your zip code and you are done.

U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein:
Washington, D.C.: (202) 224-3841 / San Francisco: (415) 393-0707
Los Angeles: (310) 914-7300 / San Diego: (619) 231-1108

Kyle from People for the American Way’s rightwingwatch.org discusses how the Right charges opponents of their judicial nominees as being racist or accusing the nominee of being racist — neither of which are true:

Ever since the election of President Bush, Republicans and their allies on the Right have frequently dealt with opposition to his controversial judicial nominations by ignoring the arguments raised by those with legitimate concerns about a nominee’s record in favor of knocking down strawmen of their own creation.

…

Thus, it should come as no surprise that with a battle brewing over the nomination of Leslie Southwick to a seat on the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit – not incidentally, the very same seat for which Charles Pickering and Michael Wallace were nominated, both of whom faced significant opposition due to their disturbing records on civil rights - the Right has reverted to form and begun using both of these tactics: claiming either that opponents of Southwick’s confirmation are racist or are accusing him of being a racist.